Opinion
No. 34057
Decided October 20, 1954.
Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal zoning ordinance — Uses to which property to be devoted — Council's consideration of economic rule of supply and demand — Attempted freezing of property because of possible future public need — Declaratory judgment action — Parties — Jurisdiction — Powers of municipalities — Section 3, Article XVIII, Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.
Mr. Hubert B. Fuller and Mr. Perry L. Graham, for appellee.
Mr. Paul H. Torbet, director of law, for appellants.
It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, HART, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.