From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendrick v. Beto

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 28, 1966
360 F.2d 618 (5th Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 22810.

April 28, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Joe M. Ingraham, Judge, 253 F. Supp. 994.

Percy N. Hendrick, pro se.

Sam R. Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Houston, Tex., Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Asst. Atty. Gen., T.B. Wright, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Howard M. Fender, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for appellee.

Before JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and HUNTER, District Judge.


In the district court the appellant sought relief from state court convictions by an application for habeas corpus. It was held that he had not been deprived of any Federally protected right and the court dismissed his petition. We conclude that the district court was correct in its decision. Its judgment is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hendrick v. Beto

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 28, 1966
360 F.2d 618 (5th Cir. 1966)
Case details for

Hendrick v. Beto

Case Details

Full title:Percy N. HENDRICK, Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 28, 1966

Citations

360 F.2d 618 (5th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Tyler v. Wyrick

Tyler would still have two valid 1965 convictions which would justify invocation of the Missouri…

Rodriguez v. State

This procedural requirement was entirely different from that authorized in many other jurisdictions and in…