From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson v. Sirmons

United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Aug 11, 2008
No. CIV 02-621-FHS-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 11, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV 02-621-FHS-KEW.

August 11, 2008


OPINION AND ORDER


Petitioner appealed the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded this court's decision with directions to conduct an evidentiary hearing. Henderson v. Sirmons, No. 06-7038, slip op. at 9 (10th Cir. July 21, 2008). The court is required to appoint counsel for petitioner, if he qualifies under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. See Rule 8(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; see also Swazo v. Wyoming Dep't of Corr. State Penitentiary Warden, 23 F.3d 332, 333 (10th Cir. 1994) (holding that appointment of counsel is mandatory in habeas corpus proceeding when an evidentiary hearing is required).

ACCORDINGLY, petitioner is directed to complete a Financial Affidavit and to have the authorized officer at his institution complete a Statement of Institutional Accounts. Petitioner is further directed to file the two financial forms with the court within ten (10) days, so the court can determine his eligibility for appointed counsel. The Court Clerk is directed to send petitioner the two financial forms and to send a copy of this order to petitioner's custodian and the trust fund officer at petitioner's facility.


Summaries of

Henderson v. Sirmons

United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Aug 11, 2008
No. CIV 02-621-FHS-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Henderson v. Sirmons

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY HENDERSON, Petitioner, v. MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 11, 2008

Citations

No. CIV 02-621-FHS-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 11, 2008)