From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helman v. County of Warren

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1986
67 N.Y.2d 799 (N.Y. 1986)

Summary

In Helman, plaintiff, whose business was destroyed by fire, alleged that the damage was caused by the County's failure to respond to a neighbor's self-initiated fire distress call to 911.

Summary of this case from Kircher v. City of Jamestown

Opinion

Argued February 7, 1986

Decided March 20, 1986

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Edmund L. Shea, J.

Jeffrey Canale and William V. Canale for appellant.

Jason L. Shaw for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 111 A.D.2d 560). Completely absent in this case was any "direct contact between agents of the municipality and the injured party", upon which a special duty could be predicated (Sorichetti v City of New York, 65 N.Y.2d 461, 469; see also, Yearwood v Town of Brighton, 64 N.Y.2d 667).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR. Taking no part: Judge SIMONS.


Summaries of

Helman v. County of Warren

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1986
67 N.Y.2d 799 (N.Y. 1986)

In Helman, plaintiff, whose business was destroyed by fire, alleged that the damage was caused by the County's failure to respond to a neighbor's self-initiated fire distress call to 911.

Summary of this case from Kircher v. City of Jamestown
Case details for

Helman v. County of Warren

Case Details

Full title:LLOYD HELMAN, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF WARREN, Respondent, et al., Defendant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 20, 1986

Citations

67 N.Y.2d 799 (N.Y. 1986)

Citing Cases

Kircher v. City of Jamestown

While we would agree that no rule should be so unyielding that it is mechanically applied without regard for…

Tarter v. State of New York

Therefore, the Board's actions are entitled to absolute immunity, notwithstanding that discovery could prove…