From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heller v. Heller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 2001
287 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted September 17, 2001.

October 9, 2001.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment entered January 31, 1994, the defendant former husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.H.O.), dated August 2, 2000, which, after a hearing, granted the motion of the plaintiff former wife to modify the maintenance provisions of the judgment of divorce.

Bechtle Murphy, Garden City, N.Y. (Eugene W. Bechtle, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Rita A. Heller, Farmingdale, N.Y., respondent pro se.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, P.J., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN and THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court's conclusion that the plaintiff satisfied her burden of demonstrating "extreme hardship" warranting modification of the maintenance provisions of the judgment of divorce in which the terms of the parties' stipulation of settlement were incorporated but not merged (see, Steinberg v. Steinberg, 275 A.D.2d 705; Praeger v. Praeger, 162 A.D.2d 671), finds ample support in the record. The medical testimony substantiated the deterioration of the plaintiff's medical conditions and the need for further surgery, and demonstrated that her loss of income was unavoidable (see, Zacchia v. Zacchia, 168 A.D.2d 677).


Summaries of

Heller v. Heller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 2001
287 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Heller v. Heller

Case Details

Full title:RITA A. HELLER, RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT R. HELLER, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 9, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 625

Citing Cases

Steinberg v. Steinberg

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The defendant…