From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helen Verrillo v. Green

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 10, 1967
203 A.2d 20 (Conn. 1967)

Opinion

Argued May 9, 1967

Decided May 10, 1967

Action to recover damages for injury to person and property, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County, by transfer from the Superior Court in that county, and tried to the jury before DeVita, J.; the court directed a verdict for the defendant Linda S. Delaney and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs against the named defendant et al. and, from the judgment rendered thereon, after a remittitur was filed by the plaintiff Louis Verrillo, the named defendant et al. appealed. No error.

William W. Sprague, with whom was James T. Haviland II, for the appellants (named defendant et al.).

William R. Davis, with whom, on the brief, were Leon RisCassi and Frank Odlum, for the appellees (plaintiffs).


This appeal claimed error in a portion of the charge to the jury on the issue of damages and in the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict as excessive.

In the light of the entire charge on the issue of damages and the limited exception taken to it, we find nothing erroneous. Lucier v. Meriden-Wallingford Sand Stone Co., 153 Conn. 422, 426, 216 A.2d 818.

On the evidence presented, the jury could reasonably find that the damages awarded constituted fair, just and reasonable compensation for the injuries the plaintiffs sustained. Accordingly, there was no error in the refusal of the court to set the verdict aside. Schaller v. Roadside Inn, Inc., 154 Conn. 61, 68, 221 A.2d 263; Lopez v. Price, 145 Conn. 560, 564, 569, 145 A.2d 127.


Summaries of

Helen Verrillo v. Green

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 10, 1967
203 A.2d 20 (Conn. 1967)
Case details for

Helen Verrillo v. Green

Case Details

Full title:HELEN VERRILLO ET AL. v. ARTHUR F. GREEN ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: May 10, 1967

Citations

203 A.2d 20 (Conn. 1967)
203 A.2d 20

Citing Cases

Neal v. Shiels, Inc.

The jury reasonably could have found that the amount awarded constituted fair, just and reasonable…

Lee v. Lee

Slabinski v. Dix, supra, 629; see Jerz v. Humphrey, 160 Conn. 219, 224, 276 A.2d 884; 22 Am.Jur.2d, Damages,…