From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heisler v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 17, 1972
463 F.2d 375 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 26121.

June 21, 1972. Rehearing Denied July 17, 1972.

Francis Heisler (argued), Richard M. Silver, Patricia Lane, of Heisler Stewart, Carmel, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellant.

Gary R. Allen (argued), Meyer Rothwacks, Thomas L. Stapleton, Johnnie Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., James L. Browning, U.S. Atty., Gary K. Shelton, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Before CHAMBERS, BROWNING and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.


In this tax case the district court had jurisdiction over the refund claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1). The appellants, however, do not fit within the statute. Their bodies and skills are not among the "other natural deposits" for which the Internal Revenue Code allows a deduction for percentage depletion.

On the claim that 26 U.S.C. §§ 611 et seq. are unconstitutional, the Heislers lack the requisite standing to raise this issue. Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 88 S.Ct. 1942, 20 L.Ed.2d 947 (1968).

The appellants style their lawsuit a class action. However, there is no showing that any other members of the purported class filed the requisite demands for refund. 26 U.S.C § 7422.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Heisler v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 17, 1972
463 F.2d 375 (9th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Heisler v. United States

Case Details

Full title:FRIEDY B. HEISLER, M.D. AND FRANCIS HEISLER, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 17, 1972

Citations

463 F.2d 375 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Klender v. U.S.

The government also raises the issue of sovereign immunity, not suggesting that the Court lacks jurisdiction…

Kleiboemer v. District of Columbia

Further, as pointed out in the District's brief, at the time Congress directed the Superior Court to adopt…