From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heiser v. Hatch

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 4, 1881
86 N.Y. 614 (N.Y. 1881)

Opinion

Argued April 25, 1881

Decided October 4, 1881

John E. Burrill for appellants.

Samuel B. Clarke for respondents.


FOLGER, Ch. J., reads for affirmance of order of General Term, and for judgment absolute against appellants on stipulation.

All concur, except DANFORTH, J., not voting.

Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Heiser v. Hatch

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 4, 1881
86 N.Y. 614 (N.Y. 1881)
Case details for

Heiser v. Hatch

Case Details

Full title:HENRY A. HEISER et al., Respondents, v . DANIEL B. HATCH et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 4, 1881

Citations

86 N.Y. 614 (N.Y. 1881)

Citing Cases

Washington Gas Co. v. Dist. of Columbia

If he then neglects or refuses to make any defence he may have, the judgment will bind him in the same way…

Village of Port Jervis v. First National B'K

In such case it has been held that it is unnecessary that he should have notice in writing, or even express…