From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Height v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 11, 2009
411 Md. 662 (Md. 2009)

Opinion

No. 146, September Term, 2009.

December 11, 2009.

Michael R. Malloy, Asst. Public Defender (Elizabeth L. Julian, Acting Public Defender), for Petitioner.

Susannah E. Prucka, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen.), for Respondent.

Submitted before BELL, C.J., HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, MURPHY, ADKINS and BARBERA, JJ.


The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case, it is this 11th day of December, 2009,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, summarily vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court for reconsideration in light of Wright v. State, 411 Md. 503, 983 A.2d 519 (2009). Costs in this Court to be paid by the Respondent, and costs in the Court of Special Appeals to abide the result.


Summaries of

Height v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 11, 2009
411 Md. 662 (Md. 2009)
Case details for

Height v. State

Case Details

Full title:Andrew HEIGHT v. STATE of Maryland

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Dec 11, 2009

Citations

411 Md. 662 (Md. 2009)
984 A.2d 871

Citing Cases

Sesay v. State

" As there were no objections to either of these comments, however, Sesay's argument that neither one was…

Ortuno v. State

However, we have also stated that untimely objections to an argument still may be sufficient to preserve the…