From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Mar 1, 2010
990 A.2d 455 (D.C. 2010)

Opinion

No. 07-CV-158.

March 1, 2010.

BEFORE: WASHINGTON, Chief Judge; RUIZ, REID, GLICKMAN, KRAMER, FISHER, BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, THOMPSON, and OBERLY, Associate Judges.

Prior report: 980 A.2d 1229.


ORDER


On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing en banc, and the response thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that appellant's petition for rehearing en banc is granted, and the opinion and judgment of October 1, 2009, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall file its brief within 30 days from the date of this order, appellee shall file its brief within 30 days after filing of appellant's brief. Any responsive brief shall be filed within 20 days thereafter. Each party shall file ten copies of its briefs. These new briefs shall be specifically designed for consideration by and addressed to the en banc court and shall supersede all briefs previously filed in this appeal. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that any requests for extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and will be granted only upon a showing of good cause.


Summaries of

Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Mar 1, 2010
990 A.2d 455 (D.C. 2010)
Case details for

Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker

Case Details

Full title:Terry HEDGEPETH, Appellant, v. WHITMAN WALKER CLINIC, et al., Appellees

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 1, 2010

Citations

990 A.2d 455 (D.C. 2010)

Citing Cases

Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker Clinic

Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker Clinic, 980 A.2d 1229 (D.C. 2009). We granted the petition for rehearing en banc…