From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heatherly v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2009
363 N.C. 115 (N.C. 2009)

Opinion

No. 317A06-2.

Filed 20 March 2009.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 189 N.C. App. —, 658 S.E.2d 11 (2008), affirming an order entered 21 March 2006 by Judge Henry W. Hight, Jr. in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 8 September 2008.

North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law, by Jeanette Doran Brooks and Robert F. Orr, for plaintiff-appellants; and North Carolina Justice Center, by Jack Holtzman, for plaintiff-intervenor-appellants Willis Williams and the North Carolina Common Sense Foundation. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Norma S. Harrell and Ronald M. Marquette, Special Deputy Attorneys General, for defendant-appellees. Williams Mullen, by Charles B. Neely, Jr., for the Tax Foundation, amicus curiae.


Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, the remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Heatherly v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2009
363 N.C. 115 (N.C. 2009)
Case details for

Heatherly v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES HEATHERLY, THOMAS SPAMPINATO, W. EDWARD GOODALL, JR., PAUL STAM…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 2009

Citations

363 N.C. 115 (N.C. 2009)

Citing Cases

Swaps, LLC v. ASL Props., Inc.

And, in any event, Heatherly later was affirmed by an equally divided Supreme Court in a per curiam opinion…