From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hazlewood v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 6, 2013
6:12-CV-798 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2013)

Summary

finding that the medical opinion that plaintiff had "mild to moderate limitations in walking, pushing, and pulling" supported the "ALJ's determination that plaintiff could physically perform light work"

Summary of this case from Caritsa B. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

6:12-CV-798

08-06-2013

BECKY L. HAZLEWOOD, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

OFFICE OF PETER W. ANTONOWICZ Attorney for Plaintiff OFFICE OF REGIONAL GENERAL COUNSEL Attorneys for Defendant Social Security Administration OF COUNSEL: PETER W. ANTONOWICZ, ESQ. ANDREEA L. LECHLEITNER, ESQ.


APPEARANCES: OFFICE OF PETER W. ANTONOWICZ
Attorney for Plaintiff
OFFICE OF REGIONAL GENERAL

COUNSEL
Attorneys for Defendant
Social Security Administration
OF COUNSEL: PETER W. ANTONOWICZ, ESQ. ANDREEA L. LECHLEITNER, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiff Becky L. Hazlewood filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Social Security Disability Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. By Report-Recommendation dated May 7, 2013, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and the case remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a further analysis of plaintiff's ability to perform her prior work. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

The Commissioner's decision is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a further analysis of plaintiff's ability to perform her prior work, consistent with the Report-Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

United S ates D istrict Judge
Dated: August 6, 2013

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

Hazlewood v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 6, 2013
6:12-CV-798 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2013)

finding that the medical opinion that plaintiff had "mild to moderate limitations in walking, pushing, and pulling" supported the "ALJ's determination that plaintiff could physically perform light work"

Summary of this case from Caritsa B. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

affirming ALJ's determination that claimant could perform light work where supported by consultative examiner's opinion that claimant had "mild limitations in carrying and sitting[] and mild to moderate limitations in walking, pushing, and pulling"

Summary of this case from Elnora C. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

affirming ALJ's determination that claimant could perform light work where supported by consultative examiner's opinion that claimant had only "mild limitations in carrying and sitting[] and mild to moderate limitations in walking, pushing, and pulling"

Summary of this case from Alexander v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Hazlewood v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:BECKY L. HAZLEWOOD, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 6, 2013

Citations

6:12-CV-798 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2013)

Citing Cases

Townsend v. Berryhill

See, e.g., Nelson v. Colvin, 2014 WL 1342964, at *12 (E.D.N.Y. 2014) ("[T]he ALJ's determination that…

Spellman v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

To be sure, an ALJ is not required to give substantial weight to any opinion, but the rejection of all the…