From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hazleton v. Lozano

U.S.
Jun 6, 2011
563 U.S. 1030 (2011)

Summary

vacating for further consideration in light of Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Whiting, 563 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 1968, 179 L.Ed.2d 1031

Summary of this case from United Sttaes v. Alabama

Opinion

No. 10–772.

06-06-2011

CITY OF HAZLETON, PENNSYLVANIA, petitioner, v. Pedro LOZANO, et al.


On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of Chamber of Commerce of United States of America v. Whiting, 563 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 1968, 179 L.Ed.2d 1031 (2011).


Summaries of

Hazleton v. Lozano

U.S.
Jun 6, 2011
563 U.S. 1030 (2011)

vacating for further consideration in light of Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Whiting, 563 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 1968, 179 L.Ed.2d 1031

Summary of this case from United Sttaes v. Alabama
Case details for

Hazleton v. Lozano

Case Details

Full title:HAZLETON, PA v. PEDRO LOZANO, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 6, 2011

Citations

563 U.S. 1030 (2011)
131 S. Ct. 2958
180 L. Ed. 2d 243

Citing Cases

Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch

See Ga. Latino Alliance for Human Rights v. Georgia, 691 F.3d 1250, 1267 (11th Cir.) (holding that § 1324…

Lozano v. City of Hazleton

Thereafter, the Supreme Court granted Hazleton's petition for a writ of certiorari and remanded this case so…