From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hazeltine Corp. v. RCA Corp.

U.S.
Aug 29, 1984
468 U.S. 1228 (1984)

Summary

finding that, when viewed in context, plaintiff's counsel's "Golden Rule" and other improper arguments did not prejudice defendants

Summary of this case from Griffith v. Mt. Carmel Medical Center

Opinion

No. 84-8.

August 29, 1984, OCTOBER TERM, 1983.


Dismissal Under Rule 53

C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 53. Reported below: 730 F. 2d 1440.


Summaries of

Hazeltine Corp. v. RCA Corp.

U.S.
Aug 29, 1984
468 U.S. 1228 (1984)

finding that, when viewed in context, plaintiff's counsel's "Golden Rule" and other improper arguments did not prejudice defendants

Summary of this case from Griffith v. Mt. Carmel Medical Center
Case details for

Hazeltine Corp. v. RCA Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HAZELTINE CORP. v. RCA CORP

Court:U.S.

Date published: Aug 29, 1984

Citations

468 U.S. 1228 (1984)
105 S. Ct. 32

Citing Cases

B.W.B. Controls, Inc. v. U.S. Indstrs, Inc.

In other words, to reach a finding of invalidity under § 102 of the Patent Act, the Court must find that a…

Weatherchem Corp. v. J.L. Clark, Inc.

This burden remains on Clark and never shifts. RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d…