From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haygood v. Younger

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 28, 1984
729 F.2d 613 (9th Cir. 1984)

Opinion

Nos. 81-4686, 82-3111 and 82-5328.

March 28, 1984.

William George Prahl, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for defendants-appellants in No. 81-4686.

Jack Jacobson, Santa Cruz, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee in No. 81-4686.

L.R. Bretz, Billings, Mont., for plaintiff-appellant in No. 82-3111.

William Conklin, Gregory H. Warner, Graybill, Ostrem, Warner Crotty, Great Falls, Mont., for defendants-appellees in No. 82-3111.

James Piatt, in pro. per.

Jay R. Adkins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellee in No. 82-5328.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, these cases are consolidated for rehearing by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignments are withdrawn.


Summaries of

Haygood v. Younger

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 28, 1984
729 F.2d 613 (9th Cir. 1984)
Case details for

Haygood v. Younger

Case Details

Full title:FRANK HAYGOOD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. EVELLE J. YOUNGER, ETC., DEFENDANTS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 28, 1984

Citations

729 F.2d 613 (9th Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

Haygood v. Younger

Our panel decision reversed that judgment. Haygood v. Younger, 718 F.2d 1472 (9th Cir. 1983), withdrawn, 729…

Bretz, v. Kelman

A divided panel of this court affirmed. Bretz v. Kelman, 722 F.2d 503 (9th Cir. 1983), withdrawn, 729 F.2d…