From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayes v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Aug 19, 1969
226 So. 2d 168 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)

Opinion

8 Div. 210.

August 19, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lawrence County, Reneau P. Almon, J.

James Francis, Decatur, for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Herbert H. Henry, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The indictment charged murder in the second degree. The jury returned a verdict finding her guilty of Manslaughter in the first degree, and fixed her punishment at imprisonment for ten years.

The evidence disclosed without dispute that defendant killed Wayne Griffin, by stabbing him with a knife. Defendant claimed self defense. Whether defendant was justified in killing deceased was, under the evidence, for the jury to determine. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction. Colvin v. State, 39 Ala. App. 355, 102 So.2d 911; Champion v. State, 35 Ala. App. 7, 44 So.2d 616.

Requested Charge I has been condemned as improper. Medley v. State, 156 Ala. 78, 47 So. 218; Amos v. State, 123 Ala. 50, 26 So. 524.

Scott v. State, 34 Ala. App. 18, 37 So.2d 670, cites several cases expressly disapproving requested Charge III.

Requested Charge VIII is misleading and invasive of the province of the jury. Its refusal was proper. Ex parte Davis et al., 184 Ala. 26, 63 So. 1010; Arnold v. State, 18 Ala. App. 453, 93 So. 83.

We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and find no reversible error. The judgment is due to be and hereby is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ALMON, J., recuses self.


Summaries of

Hayes v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Aug 19, 1969
226 So. 2d 168 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)
Case details for

Hayes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Willodean HAYES v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Aug 19, 1969

Citations

226 So. 2d 168 (Ala. Crim. App. 1969)
45 Ala. App. 108

Citing Cases

Mack v. State

The issue of self-defense was a question for the jury and it was proper for the court to instruct the jury…

Cook v. State

Under the evidence presented it was a questionable issue of fact for the jury to determine whether the…