Opinion
April 28, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff and giving her the benefit of every reasonable inference, defendants' motion for a directed verdict was properly granted in the absence of any proof to support plaintiff's claim that defendants owed her a duty to protect her against third-party criminal activity on the premises (Iannelli v Powers, 114 A.D.2d 157, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 604). We have reviewed the plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.