affirming that an injunction, in response to defendant's claim based on defendant's alleged breach of a contractual duty to use its best efforts to promote plaintiff's books, was unnecessary, as money damages could afford plaintiff adequate relief
Summary of this case from Learning Annex Holdings, LLC v. GittelmanNo. 72-47.
October 10, 1972.
Ct. App. N.Y. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 30 N. Y. 2d 34, 281 N. E. 2d 142.
affirming that an injunction, in response to defendant's claim based on defendant's alleged breach of a contractual duty to use its best efforts to promote plaintiff's books, was unnecessary, as money damages could afford plaintiff adequate relief
Summary of this case from Learning Annex Holdings, LLC v. GittelmanFull title:HAYDEN PUBLISHING Co., Inc., et al. v. VAN VALKENBURGH, NOOGER NEVILLE, Inc
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 10, 1972
DeCarlo, however, relies on dictum in Mellencamp v. Riva Music Ltd. that "trust elements come into play when…
Rattray v. City of National CityIn evaluating the plaintiff's burden in this case, the district court in effect adopted the position taken in…