From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. Cmty. Bank of Raymore

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Mar 22, 2016
136 S. Ct. 1072 (2016)

Summary

holding that a guarantor unambiguously is not an "applicant" under the Act

Summary of this case from Regions Bank v. Legal Outsource PA

Opinion

No. 14–520.

03-22-2016

Valerie J. HAWKINS and Janice A. Patterson, Petitioners v. COMMUNITY BANK OF RAYMORE.


The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.


Summaries of

Hawkins v. Cmty. Bank of Raymore

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Mar 22, 2016
136 S. Ct. 1072 (2016)

holding that a guarantor unambiguously is not an "applicant" under the Act

Summary of this case from Regions Bank v. Legal Outsource PA
Case details for

Hawkins v. Cmty. Bank of Raymore

Case Details

Full title:VALERIE J. HAWKINS AND JANICE A. PATTERSON, PETITIONERS v. COMMUNITY BANK…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Date published: Mar 22, 2016

Citations

136 S. Ct. 1072 (2016)
194 L. Ed. 2d 163

Citing Cases

Regions Bank v. Legal Outsource PA

See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1691(a), 1691a(b). Compare Hawkins v. Cmty. Bank of Raymore , 761 F.3d 937 (8th Cir. 2014),…

Woodford v. Capital Bank (In re Woodford)

The Court also questions whether the Debtor, as guarantor of the loan to Walker International, is an…