From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hausken v. Riebman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Jul 22, 2013
CASE NO. C12-1776-TSZ (W.D. Wash. Jul. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. C12-1776-TSZ

07-22-2013

PHILLIP BURTON HAUSKEN, Plaintiff, v. RACHEL RIEBMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF

DEFENDANTS

The Court, having reviewed the papers filed in support of and in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mary Alice Theiler, plaintiff's objections, the governing law, and the balance of the record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;
(2) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14) is GRANTED because there is no genuine issue of material fact such that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and
(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Theiler.

____________________

THOMAS S. ZILLY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hausken v. Riebman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Jul 22, 2013
CASE NO. C12-1776-TSZ (W.D. Wash. Jul. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Hausken v. Riebman

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP BURTON HAUSKEN, Plaintiff, v. RACHEL RIEBMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Date published: Jul 22, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. C12-1776-TSZ (W.D. Wash. Jul. 22, 2013)

Citing Cases

Perez v. Cogburn

Other cases have also articulated the standard set out in Harper as holding that the requirements of Due…