From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hauptmann v. Wilentz

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 11, 1985
770 F.2d 1070 (3d Cir. 1985)

Summary

concluding that Pennsylvania public policy obligates employer not to discharge an employee for refusing to participate in commercial bribery

Summary of this case from Urban v. Walgreen, Co.

Opinion

No. 84-5454.

July 11, 1985.

Appeal from D.N.J., Lacey, J., 570 F.Supp. 351.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Hauptmann v. Wilentz

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 11, 1985
770 F.2d 1070 (3d Cir. 1985)

concluding that Pennsylvania public policy obligates employer not to discharge an employee for refusing to participate in commercial bribery

Summary of this case from Urban v. Walgreen, Co.

applying Kubrick rule to § 1983 claim

Summary of this case from Plain v. Flicker
Case details for

Hauptmann v. Wilentz

Case Details

Full title:Hauptmann v. Wilentz

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jul 11, 1985

Citations

770 F.2d 1070 (3d Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Slippi-Mensah v. Mills

Conspiracy claims under § 1985 must be pleaded with factual specificity. Hauptmann v. Wilentz, 570 F. Supp.…

Robinson v. Winslow Tp.

Although the Brady decision itself focused on the obligations of prosecutors, subsequent decisions have…