From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hasty v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 5, 1990
394 S.E.2d 800 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

A90A0196.

DECIDED APRIL 5, 1990. REHEARING DENIED APRIL 20, 1990.

Motion to suppress. Cobb State Court. Before Judge Burke.

B. Clark Jones, for appellant.

Patrick H. Head, Solicitor, Cindi L. Teelon, Beverly M. Hartung, Assistant Solicitors, for appellee.


The appellant, Jeremy Hasty, was convicted of underage possession of alcohol. There is no transcript of the trial or stipulation of the evidence, but Hasty asserts that he was arrested after being required to submit to an alcosensor test in a McDonald's parking lot, even though he had not been driving the car he was in. Hasty represented himself at all stages of the trial proceedings, and filed a motion to suppress the evidence. On appeal, he contends that the trial court failed to address that motion.

In the absence of a transcript, we cannot consider enumerations of error concerning the evidence or proceedings at trial. Dean v. State, 188 Ga. App. 128 ( 372 S.E.2d 286) (1988). Accordingly, we must assume that the motion to suppress received a proper disposition during the trial.

Judgment affirmed. Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 5, 1990 — REHEARING DENIED APRIL 20, 1990.


Summaries of

Hasty v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 5, 1990
394 S.E.2d 800 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Hasty v. State

Case Details

Full title:HASTY v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 5, 1990

Citations

394 S.E.2d 800 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)
195 Ga. App. 427

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Dean v. State, 188 Ga. App. 128 ( 372 S.E.2d 286) (1988)." Hasty v. State, 195 Ga. App. 427 ( 394 S.E.2d…

Southerton v. State

Although trial counsel may have failed to inform appellant of the right to have the trial and proceedings…