From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harwood v. Tobin

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 19, 1952
194 F.2d 538 (6th Cir. 1952)

Opinion

No. 11419.

February 19, 1952.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee at Jackson; Marion Speed Boyd, Judge.

Taylor Taylor and Robert E. Joyner, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

Wm. S. Tyson, Bessie Margolin, Washington, D.C., Wm. P. Murphy, Nashville, Tenn., Beverley R. Worrell, Birmingham, Ala., and Sylvia Ellison, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before SIMONS, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.


This cause was heard by the court on the transcript of record, briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties;

And the court being of the opinion that the Findings of Fact of the District Judge are not clearly erroneous, and that there was no error in the Conclusions of Law applicable thereto, Walling v. American Needlecrafts, 6 Cir., 139 F.2d 60; Rutherford Corp. v. McComb, 331 U.S. 722, 67 S.Ct. 1473, 91 L.Ed. 1772;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.


Summaries of

Harwood v. Tobin

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 19, 1952
194 F.2d 538 (6th Cir. 1952)
Case details for

Harwood v. Tobin

Case Details

Full title:Doris HARWOOD, Appellant, v. Maurice J. TOBIN, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 19, 1952

Citations

194 F.2d 538 (6th Cir. 1952)

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Law

The homeworkers referred to in Finding of Fact (2), above, are the employees of the defendant and the…