From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvey v. Tucker

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Oct 21, 2011
Case No. 3:09cv43/LAC/CJK (N.D. Fla. Oct. 21, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09cv43/LAC/CJK.

October 21, 2011


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 27, 2011. (Doc. 53). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) challenging the conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Ivan J. Harvey, entered in the Circuit Court of Escambia County, Florida, case numbers 04-5775, 06-3599, 06-4302 and 06-4303 are DENIED, and the clerk is directed to close the file.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harvey v. Tucker

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Oct 21, 2011
Case No. 3:09cv43/LAC/CJK (N.D. Fla. Oct. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Harvey v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:IVAN S. HARVEY, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S. TUCKER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Oct 21, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:09cv43/LAC/CJK (N.D. Fla. Oct. 21, 2011)

Citing Cases

Merchant v. Foreman

The point is not well taken. Defendants' third point is that statements made by them concerning the…

Jay v. General Realties Co.

I think the language of that case must be confined to the facts of that case, especially in view of Robertson…