From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartman v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Jan 8, 2007
918 A.2d 338 (Del. 2007)

Summary

holding that the Superior Court properly denied the defendant's presentence motion to withdraw guilty plea when the defendant satisfactorily completed a colloquy with the Court and signed the Truth-In-Sentencing Forms, notwithstanding Defendant's unsubstantiated allegations that, inter alia, he was pressured by his attorney and his family to plead guilty

Summary of this case from State v. Schofield

Opinion

No. 265, 2005.

January 8, 2007.

Appeal from the Superior (Kent) Cr 0306012643.


Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hartman v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Jan 8, 2007
918 A.2d 338 (Del. 2007)

holding that the Superior Court properly denied the defendant's presentence motion to withdraw guilty plea when the defendant satisfactorily completed a colloquy with the Court and signed the Truth-In-Sentencing Forms, notwithstanding Defendant's unsubstantiated allegations that, inter alia, he was pressured by his attorney and his family to plead guilty

Summary of this case from State v. Schofield
Case details for

Hartman v. State

Case Details

Full title:Hartman v. State

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Jan 8, 2007

Citations

918 A.2d 338 (Del. 2007)

Citing Cases

State v. Shweda

(v) whether granting the motion will prejudice the State or unduly inconvenience the trial court. Hartman v.…

State v. Schofield

Tr. I at 8-11; Tr. II at 9-13.See also Hartman v. State, 918 A.2d 338 (Del. 2007) (holding that the Superior…