Opinion
June Term, 1898.
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Blaechinska v. Howard Mission, etc. ( 130 N.Y. 497).
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hartman v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1898
32 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Summaries of
Hartman v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1898
32 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Case details for
Hartman v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:Julius Hartman, Respondent, v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jun 1, 1898
Citations
32 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Citing Cases
State ex Rel. Brancato v. Trimble
not contravene the decision in Kramer v. Power Light Co., 311 Mo. 369, for that case did not rule that there…
Swanson v. Georgia Casualty Co.King v. Railway Co., 108 Kan. 372; Railroad v. Salmon, 14 Kan. 512; Hannibal Railroad Co. v. Fox, 31 Kan.…