From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartman v. Arlington County

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 3, 1990
903 F.2d 290 (4th Cir. 1990)

Summary

holding such practice to be expressly permitted by § 541.118(b)

Summary of this case from Arrington v. City of Macon

Opinion

No. 89-3507.

Argued January 10, 1990.

Decided May 3, 1990. As Amended May 7, 1990.

Gregory Keith McGillivary, and Thomas A. Woodley, on brief, Mulholland Hickey, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Peter Harlan Maier, Asst. County Atty., Arlington, Va., James P. McElligott, Jr., Scott S. Cairns, McGuire, Woods, Battle Boothe, Richmond, Va., on briefs, for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, WILKINSON, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.


Current and former employees of the Arlington County, Virginia Fire Department ("Fire Shift Commanders") brought this suit against Arlington County, Virginia, seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief, claiming that they were entitled to overtime compensation from Arlington County under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. ("FLSA"). District Judge Claude M. Hilton granted summary judgment in favor of Arlington County after determining that the Fire Shift Commanders are exempt from the overtime requirements of the FLSA under section 213(a)(1) because they are employed in an executive capacity: they are salaried employees who are paid more than $250 a week, they direct the activity of two or more firefighters on the shift, and their primary duty is the management of the fire station. See 29 C.F.R. § 541.1(f). The Fire Shift Commanders appeal that judgment.

We note that this is not the first time that the lower courts have been asked to apply the FLSA overtime provisions to Virginia fire captains. Several lower courts have been presented with similar disputes. See Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Alexandria, 720 F. Supp. 1230 (E.D.Va. 1989), appeals docketed, Nos. 89-2497, 89-2498 (4th Cir. 1989); Sarver v. City of Roanoke, C/A No. 88-0179-R (W.D.Va. June 15, 1989); Chadwick v. City of Norfolk, C/A No. 88-248-N (E.D.Va. Dec. 19, 1988); Harkins v. Chesapeake, C/A No. 88-254-N (E.D.Va. Dec. 2, 1988). Like the lower court in this case, these courts have held that the fire captains were exempt employees.

We agree with the district court that the Fire Shift Commanders in this case are exempt from the FLSA overtime requirements. After reviewing the record and briefs, and after hearing oral arguments, we find that there are no material facts in dispute and that summary judgment was properly granted for the County. We affirm on the reasoning of the lower court. Hartman v. Arlington County, Virginia, 720 F. Supp. 1227 (E.D.Va. 1989).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hartman v. Arlington County

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 3, 1990
903 F.2d 290 (4th Cir. 1990)

holding such practice to be expressly permitted by § 541.118(b)

Summary of this case from Arrington v. City of Macon

finding hourly based overtime compatible with payment on a salary basis

Summary of this case from Demos v. City of Indianapolis
Case details for

Hartman v. Arlington County

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM RONALD HARTMAN; PETER ANGEL VAZQUEZ; LEWIS A. COOPER; STANLEY B…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 3, 1990

Citations

903 F.2d 290 (4th Cir. 1990)

Citing Cases

Morrison v. Cnty. of Fairfax

The district court awarded summary judgment to the County, holding that all of the Captains are exempt…

Hilbert v. District of Columbia

This theory has some appeal. Though it has been rejected in the Fourth and Fifth Circuits, see York v. City…