From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrod v. Scribner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 13, 2015
590 F. App'x 679 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 08-56203

01-13-2015

JESSE HARROD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. A. K. SCRIBNER, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:03-cv-06598-CJC-PJW Central District of California, Los Angeles ORDER Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and PREGERSON and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

The memorandum disposition filed on August 24, 2010 is withdrawn. The petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot.

In light of the newly uncovered transcript of the June 30, 2000 voir dire proceedings, as well as this Court's opinion in Jamerson v. Runnels, 713 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2013), this case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings on Mr. Harrod's Batson claim.

Judge Callahan would not remand this matter to the district court because she finds that Harrod's claim is exhausted and unavailing under the AEDPA doubly deferential standard of review.


Summaries of

Harrod v. Scribner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 13, 2015
590 F. App'x 679 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Harrod v. Scribner

Case Details

Full title:JESSE HARROD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. A. K. SCRIBNER, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 13, 2015

Citations

590 F. App'x 679 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Harrod v. Scribner

On January 13, 2015, however, the circuit court withdrew its 2010 opinion and remanded the case to the…