From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Oct 30, 2019
NO. 09-19-00323-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 30, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 09-19-00323-CR

10-30-2019

LAGARY HARRISON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 96-11-01599-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 17, 2019, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Harrison did not file a response.

Harrison has failed to demonstrate that the trial court has signed an order that is appealable at this time. See Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (holding that intermediate appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

/s/_________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice Submitted on October 29, 2019
Opinion Delivered October 30, 2019
Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

Harrison v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Oct 30, 2019
NO. 09-19-00323-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Harrison v. State

Case Details

Full title:LAGARY HARRISON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Oct 30, 2019

Citations

NO. 09-19-00323-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 30, 2019)