From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 4, 1974
516 S.W.2d 192 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974)

Summary

In Harrison v. State, 516 S.W.2d 192 (Tex.Cr.App. 1974) the defendant's appointed counsel failed to file timely a brief and advised this Court by a letter "that he does not represent the appellant for purposes of appeal.

Summary of this case from Ward v. State

Opinion


516 S.W.2d 192 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974) James Eugene HARRISON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 49377. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. December 4, 1974

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty. and Clyde F. DeWitt, III, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of possession of heroin. The court found the appellant guilty on his plea of guilty, and assessed his punishment at imprisonment for five years.

The appellant at the time of trial filed an affidavit of indigency, and the court appointed counsel to represent him. At the time punishment was assessed the appellant's counsel reminded the court of the appellant's indigency, and he made known the appellant's desire to appeal and gave notice of appeal. The appellate record before us is not accompanied by brief filed in appellant's behalf pursuant to Art. 40.09, Sec. 9, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. The court-appointed trial counsel has advised this court by letter that he does not represent the appellant for purposes of appeal. However, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court permitted appointed counsel to withdraw. As far as this court is concerned the trial counsel still represents appellant on appeal. We must abate this appeal until the trial court shall take such steps as are necessary to provide appellant with the effective aid of counsel on appeal. See Richardson v. State, 495 S.W.2d 246 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); cf. Steel v. State, 453 S.W.2d 486 (Tex.Cr.App.1970).

The appeal is abated.


Summaries of

Harrison v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 4, 1974
516 S.W.2d 192 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974)

In Harrison v. State, 516 S.W.2d 192 (Tex.Cr.App. 1974) the defendant's appointed counsel failed to file timely a brief and advised this Court by a letter "that he does not represent the appellant for purposes of appeal.

Summary of this case from Ward v. State
Case details for

Harrison v. State

Case Details

Full title:James Eugene HARRISON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 4, 1974

Citations

516 S.W.2d 192 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974)

Citing Cases

Ward v. State

As a threshold observation, it is abundantly clear that an appointed attorney's legal responsibilities do not…

Ward v. State

By giving the notice of appeal, trial counsel voluntarily became appellant's attorney of record on appeal,…