From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 21, 1990
557 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

holding that the trial court erred in ordering an adult defendant to pay restitution in an amount that included punitive damages and damages not supported by the evidence

Summary of this case from C.W., M.G. v. State

Opinion

No. 88-2674.

February 14, 1990. Rehearing Denied March 21, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Rupert J. Smith, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the appellant's conviction of tampering with a motor vehicle odometer but reverse the sentence imposed.

The record reflects sufficient evidence to submit the facts, in part circumstantial, to the jury. See, e.g., State v. Law, 14 F.L.W. 387 (Fla. July 28, 1989); Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44 (Fla. 1974); Hampton v. State, 549 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

We find no abuse of discretion in denying appellant's motion for a bill of particulars. The appellant argues that he is entitled to a statement of particulars where the information charges the violation of more than one statute and contains charges reflecting more than one way in which the crime was committed. However, the appellant failed to demonstrate lack of notice, prejudice, surprise or the inability to prepare an adequate defense. E.g., United States v. Mackey, 551 F.2d 967 (5th Cir. 1977); Jones v. State, 466 So.2d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 478 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1985).

Additionally, the trial court erred by ordering the defendant to pay restitution in an amount that included a sum for "punitive" damages and a sum not supported by any evidence of actual damages incurred by the victims. The state also concedes that we must reverse the imposition of community service in lieu of the payment of costs. Houston v. State, 540 So.2d 943 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Therefore, the judgment is affirmed, the sentence imposed is reversed and the cause is remanded for resentencing.

GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harrison v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 21, 1990
557 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

holding that the trial court erred in ordering an adult defendant to pay restitution in an amount that included punitive damages and damages not supported by the evidence

Summary of this case from C.W., M.G. v. State
Case details for

Harrison v. State

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY HARRISON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 21, 1990

Citations

557 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

As amended in 1986, section 27.3455, Florida Statutes, discontinued the community service option. See section…

Decker v. State

We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a statement of…