From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Weiss Engineering Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 12, 1943
267 App. Div. 96 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

November 12, 1943.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County, SCHMUCK, J.

Karl T. Frederick of counsel ( George L. Kobbe with him on the brief; Kobbe, Thatcher, Frederick Hoar, attorneys), for appellants.

William T. Harris of counsel ( Manuel Weiss with him on the brief), for respondent.


The facts alleged and the relief demanded in the complaint concern only the corporate structure of the defendant corporation organized under the laws of New Jersey and thus relate exclusively to its internal affairs. ( Cohn v. Mishkoff Costello Co., 256 N.Y. 102; Bickart v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co., 243 App. Div. 72.) The court therefore should have declined to assume jurisdiction.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the complaint dismissed.

MARTIN, P.J., UNTERMYER, DORE, COHN and CALLAHAN, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the complaint dismissed.


Summaries of

Harris v. Weiss Engineering Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 12, 1943
267 App. Div. 96 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

Harris v. Weiss Engineering Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARY HARRIS, Suing on Behalf of Herself and Other Stockholders of Weiss…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1943

Citations

267 App. Div. 96 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
44 N.Y.S.2d 643

Citing Cases

Wagner v. Braunsberg

(See Gregonis v. Philadelphia Reading Coal Iron Co., 235 N.Y. 152, 158; 26 Fordham L. Rev. 535 and cases…

Mook v. Berger

With the Connecticut courts easily accessible to the parties, why should they not be relegated to those…