From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sep 14, 2022
348 So. 3d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 4D21-3285.

09-14-2022

Lecedric Prentice HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.


Per Curiam .

Affirmed. See Kovaleski v. State, 103 So.3d 859 (Fla. 2012). On the issue of costs, reversal is not warranted because the State has identified costs which total the $418 imposed. Cf. Bartolone v. State, 327 So.3d 331, 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (reversing where the "trial court did not cite to any other mandatory costs, and the State has not identified costs which would total $418 ") (emphasis supplied).

Klingensmith, C.J., Gross and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sep 14, 2022
348 So. 3d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Harris v. State

Case Details

Full title:Lecedric Prentice HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Sep 14, 2022

Citations

348 So. 3d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Citing Cases

McNaughton v. State

As to other costs and fees imposed by the court, the State sufficiently identified those costs, which are…