From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 11, 2000
766 So. 2d 403 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

holding that the defendant's sentence for armed burglary in violation of section 810.02(b) was improperly enhanced pursuant to section 775.087 because the “use of a weapon or a firearm is an essential element of armed burglary”

Summary of this case from Jackson v. State

Opinion

No. 2D97-902

Opinion filed August 11, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Cecelia M. Moore, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Damien Antonio Harris appeals his convictions for armed burglary and sexual battery. We affirm Harris's convictions without discussion. However, Harris was sentenced under the 1995 guidelines which have been declared to be unconstitutional. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000). Accordingly, this matter must be remanded to the trial court in order that it reconsider the sentences imposed in accordance with Heggs. See Smith v. State, 25 Fla. Law Weekly D1273 (Fla. 2d DCA May 24, 2000).

Additionally, Harris's sentence for armed burglary in violation of section 810.02(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), was improperly enhanced to a life felony pursuant to section 775.087, Florida Statutes (1995). The use of a weapon or a firearm is an essential element of armed burglary. See Fowler v. State, 375 So.2d 879, 880 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Thus, section 775.087(1) itself precludes this classification. The trial court's reclassification of the armed burglary conviction to a life felony is reversed and we remand for the judgment to be corrected to reflect a first-degree felony conviction. See Wright v. State, 617 So.2d 837, 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

The convictions are affirmed, reclassification of the armed burglary is reversed and remanded, and the sentences are remanded for reconsideration as discussed above.

BLUE, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 11, 2000
766 So. 2d 403 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

holding that the defendant's sentence for armed burglary in violation of section 810.02(b) was improperly enhanced pursuant to section 775.087 because the “use of a weapon or a firearm is an essential element of armed burglary”

Summary of this case from Jackson v. State
Case details for

Harris v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAMIEN ANTONIO HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 11, 2000

Citations

766 So. 2d 403 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Postaski v. State

The State concedes error on this point, noting also that the armed burglary conviction could not be…

Lowe v. State

Affirmed. See Collins v. State, 800 So.2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Harris v. State, 766 So.2d 403 (Fla. 2d DCA…