From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Pulley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 1984
726 F.2d 569 (9th Cir. 1984)

Opinion

No. 82-5246.

February 23, 1984.

Michael J. McCabe, Savitz McCabe, San Diego, Cal., for petitioner.

Charles M. Sevilla, Public Defender, San Diego, Cal., amicus curiae.

Michael D. Wellington, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Diego, Cal., for respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; William B. Enright, Judge.

Before CHOY, ANDERSON and CANBY, Circuit Judge.


ORDER

The Supreme Court, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 871, 79 L.Ed.2d 29, of the United States having reversed our decision, 692 F.2d 1189, on the issue of comparative proportionality review,

WE HEREBY AFFIRM the district court's decision on that issue and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's decision and with our decision on the issues unaffected by the Supreme Court's decision.


Summaries of

Harris v. Pulley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 1984
726 F.2d 569 (9th Cir. 1984)
Case details for

Harris v. Pulley

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ALTON HARRIS, PETITIONER, v. R. PULLEY, WARDEN OF THE CALIFORNIA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 23, 1984

Citations

726 F.2d 569 (9th Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

State v. Campbell

Following the remand from the Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit has returned the case to the district court…

People v. Allen

(See People v. Dillon (1983) 34 Cal.3d 441, 488-489 [ 194 Cal.Rptr. 390, 668 P.2d 697]; cf. People v.…