From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Oxford Metal Spinning Co. Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 24, 1942
315 Ill. App. 490 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,980. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 24, 1942

DISCOVERY AND INSPECTION, § 30penalty for failure to obey order for production. Where a defendant refused to produce documents called for by an order of court to produce, it was proper to strike defendant's answer and enter judgment as in the case of default (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1941, ch. 110, par. 259.17; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 105.17).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Cook county; Hon. HARRY M. FISHER, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in third division, first district, this court at October term, 1941.

Whitty McGah, for appellant;

William E. Moran, of counsel;

Archie Schimberg, for appellee;

Harold J. Finder, of counsel.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed June 24, 1942.


Summaries of

Harris v. Oxford Metal Spinning Co. Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 24, 1942
315 Ill. App. 490 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
Case details for

Harris v. Oxford Metal Spinning Co. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Leo P. Harris, Appellee, v. Oxford Metal Spinning Company, Inc., Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jun 24, 1942

Citations

315 Ill. App. 490 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
43 N.E.2d 186

Citing Cases

Stickler v. McCarthy

The imposition of this sanction has been approved in several cases. Kocis v. Kocis, 47 Ill. App.2d 68, 197…

Sager Glove Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.

In any event, if a party fails to produce documents as ordered by the court it is proper to strike his…