From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Lempke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 4, 2015
09 Civ. 5193 (LAP)(KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2015)

Summary

adopting report and recommendation from Mag. J. Fox

Summary of this case from Parks v. Sheahan

Opinion

09 Civ. 5193 (LAP)(KNF)

05-04-2015

REGINALD HARRIS, Petitioner, v. JOHN LEMPKE, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

:

On October 2, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Reginald Harris' ("Petitioner") petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be DENIED. Having received no objections and finding Judge Fox's decision to be correct and appropriate upon de novo review, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), his Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED. SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York

May 4, 2015

/s/_________

LORETTA A. PRESKA

Chief U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Harris v. Lempke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 4, 2015
09 Civ. 5193 (LAP)(KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2015)

adopting report and recommendation from Mag. J. Fox

Summary of this case from Parks v. Sheahan

declining to review a habeas claim regarding the jury instructions where the Appellate Division found the claim to be unpreserved on account of the lawyer's failure to contemporaneously object at trial

Summary of this case from Rios v. Miller
Case details for

Harris v. Lempke

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD HARRIS, Petitioner, v. JOHN LEMPKE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 4, 2015

Citations

09 Civ. 5193 (LAP)(KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2015)

Citing Cases

Rios v. Miller

Failure to object to the jury charge or ask for the actual possession instruction at trial serves as an…

Parks v. Sheahan

Id. at 19.New York Criminal Procedure Law § 440.10(2)(c) has been recognized by courts in this Circuit as an…