From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Garner

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 6, 1999
197 F.3d 1059 (11th Cir. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-8899

DECIDED December 6, 1999

Robert E. Toone, Stephen B. Bright, Southern Center for Human Rights, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Diane Festin LaRoss, Dept. of Law, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Peter Maier, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae/Intervenor USA.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia (No. 5:97-CV-79-4); Hugh Lawson, Judge.

(Opinion September 30, 1999, 190 F.3d 1279, 11th Cir., 1999).

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Garner

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 6, 1999
197 F.3d 1059 (11th Cir. 1999)
Case details for

Harris v. Garner

Case Details

Full title:Frederick Lamar HARRIS, Danny Chadwick, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Dec 6, 1999

Citations

197 F.3d 1059 (11th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

Shabazz-Wimberly v. Nichols

In reaching that conclusion the Ninth Circuit relied on cases from the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits in which…

Oliver v. Keller

" Id. at 193. The Eleventh Circuit has explicitly adopted the Siglar de minimis approach, see Harris v.…