From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Fischer

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jun 3, 2008
9:08-CV-271 (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2008)

Opinion

9:08-CV-271.

June 3, 2008

DUDLEY HARRIS, Plaintiff, Pro Se, 99-B-1293, Cayuga Correctional Facility, Moravia, New York.

HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General of the State of New York, Attorney for Defendants, Department of Law, Albany, NY.


DECISION and ORDER


Plaintiff, Dudley Harris, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated April 15, 2008, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the complaint be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); that prior to dismissal of plaintiff's complaint, plaintiff be provided an opportunity to cure the deficiencies of his pleading by filing an amended complaint that complies with the instructions within the Report-Recommendation; and that in the event plaintiff does not file a proper amended complaint, that the action be dismissed. The plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Report-Recommendation; however, he did file an amended complaint on April 29, 2008.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Treece, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects.See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the plaintiff's amended complaint (Docket No. 8) is referred to the Magistrate Judge for review and determination of compliance as directed in the Report-Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harris v. Fischer

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jun 3, 2008
9:08-CV-271 (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Harris v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:DUDLEY HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. FISCHER, Commissioner; SUPT. CORCORAN; MAHER…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jun 3, 2008

Citations

9:08-CV-271 (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2008)

Citing Cases

Aslani v. Sparrow Health Systems

Thus, this court continues to hold that even as a pro se litigant, Aslani is not entitled to be shielded from…