From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. California

U.S.
Jun 17, 1963
374 U.S. 499 (1963)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 135, Misc.

Decided June 17, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: See 199 Cal.App.2d 474, 18 Cal.Rptr. 708.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.


Summaries of

Harris v. California

U.S.
Jun 17, 1963
374 U.S. 499 (1963)
Case details for

Harris v. California

Case Details

Full title:HARRIS v . CALIFORNIA ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 17, 1963

Citations

374 U.S. 499 (1963)
83 S. Ct. 1876

Citing Cases

United States v. Palladino

" Censorship of Obscenity: The Developing Constitutional Standards, 45 Minn.L.Rev. 5, 99 (1960). We thus…

Swenson v. Donnell

In view of Judge Oliver's full discussion of all the relevant authorities it would be a needless exercise…