From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Bliss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 2009
60 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

March 5, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered October 2, 2007, which denied Plaintiff's motion to vacate the dismissal of this action and to restore it to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing the complaint pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27 (b) ( see Saunders v Riverbay Corp., 17 AD3d 137). Plaintiff failed to provide a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear on the July 16, 2007 trial start date, given the parties' explicit May 1, 2007 stipulation to the firm trial date with no further adjournments. We note the inadequacy of the proffered excuse (i.e., the week scheduled for trial, plaintiff was able to get time off work to attend a family event, but not for the trial), and the lengthy history of this case, which includes several prior motions to restore.


Summaries of

Harris v. Bliss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 2009
60 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Harris v. Bliss

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY HARRIS, Appellant, v. "JOHN" BLISS et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 5, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
873 N.Y.S.2d 488

Citing Cases

Philip Carey Mfg. Co. v. Dean

The seal upon the waiver of December 20, 1924, is prima facie evidence that it was placed there by the…

Gabriel v. Johnston's L.P.

V We now turn to the cross appeals of Raytheon and Johnston, which raise the issue whether the court erred in…