From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrington Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Powell Mfg. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jun 22, 1983
709 F.2d 710 (Fed. Cir. 1983)

Opinion

Misc. No. 19.

June 22, 1983.

George M. Sirilla, Raymond F. Lippitt, W. Warren Taltavull. Cushman, Darby Cushman, Washington, D.C., for Powell Mfg. Co., Inc.

Harvey B. Jacobson, Jr., Fleit, Jacobson Cohn, Washington, D.C., for Harrington Mfg. Co., Inc.


ORDER

Having considered in banc the PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1292(b) presented by Powell Manufacturing Co., Inc., and noting the absence from the Federal Courts Improvement Act, Public Law 97-164, of a grant of jurisdiction to consider interlocutory appeals on questions certified to this court by a district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), it is ORDERED:

Circuit Judge Friedman took no part in the consideration and denial of the petition.

That the Petition be, and it is hereby, denied for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Harrington Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Powell Mfg. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jun 22, 1983
709 F.2d 710 (Fed. Cir. 1983)
Case details for

Harrington Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Powell Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:HARRINGTON MANUFACTURING CO., INC. A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 22, 1983

Citations

709 F.2d 710 (Fed. Cir. 1983)

Citing Cases

Precision Screen Machines, Inc.

The district court has refused to certify the matter for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Mfg. Co.

(3) Interlocutory decrees of such district courts or the judges thereof determining the rights and…