From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrell v. State

Court of Claims
Jul 22, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 950 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1959)

Opinion

July 22, 1959

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Melvyn N. Thaler of counsel), for defendant.

Friedman Tandler ( Donald S. Sherwood of counsel), for claimant.


The defendant moves, pursuant to subdivision 2 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the claim because the claimant "has not legal capacity to sue". Said claimant is incarcerated in Sing Sing Prison serving a sentence of 5 to 10 years.

The movant relies upon section 510 of the Penal Law, bearing the heading "Forfeiture of office and suspension of civil rights", which suspends, during the term of claimant's sentence, his civil right to institute or continue this negligence action "with respect to matters other than those arising out of his arrest or detention * * *".

Claimant opposes the motion by urging that said section 510 is unconstitutional in that it violates section 1 of article I of the Constitution of our State and the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.

We rule that said section is not unconstitutional. The motion to dismiss the claim is granted. The claim is dismissed without prejudice to renewal when the proscription in section 510 is no longer applicable.

Short-form order signed.


Summaries of

Harrell v. State

Court of Claims
Jul 22, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 950 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1959)
Case details for

Harrell v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLINTON C. HARRELL, Claimant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Defendant. (Claim No…

Court:Court of Claims

Date published: Jul 22, 1959

Citations

17 Misc. 2d 950 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1959)
188 N.Y.S.2d 683

Citing Cases

Matter of Anonymous

The fact that subdivision 2 of section 79 Civ. Rights of the Civil Rights Law restores one of respondent's…

Bush v. Reid

224 F.2d 526 (5th Cir. 1955), cert. denied 350 U.S. 971, 76 S.Ct. 445, 100 L.Ed. 843 (1956). See Chinn v.…