From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper Plumbing Heating Co. v. Noel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 12, 1984
448 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-856.

April 12, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Seminole County, C. Vernon Mize, J.

Robert C. Wattles, Orlando, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


This is an appeal from a judgment in a suit to foreclose a mechanic's lien and a judgment denying counterclaim in that suit.

The sole simple issue for us to decide is whether the appellant is entitled to an attorney's fee for defending the counterclaim it won. The answer is no because the counterclaim was for damages, not a mechanic's lien. Just because the main action was for foreclosure of a mechanic's lien (which appellant lost) does not mean appellant is entitled to a fee under Section 713.29. It is only the victor in the lien action who is entitled to a fee. Appellant was not the victor.

Affirmed.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr. and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harper Plumbing Heating Co. v. Noel

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 12, 1984
448 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Harper Plumbing Heating Co. v. Noel

Case Details

Full title:HARPER PLUMBING HEATING CO., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 12, 1984

Citations

448 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Skidmore, Owings Merrill v. Volpe

We therefore hold that the trial court erred in declaring Volpe's lien valid when the evidence discloses that…

R.C. Steel Placing v. Volpe Constr

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Harper Plumbing Heating Co. v. Noel, 448 So.2d 587 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Winnie v.…