From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harmann v. Allstate Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 1999
260 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 19, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs homeowners' insurance policy issued by the defendant insurance carrier does not extend to the defense and/or indemnification of an action to recover damages sustained as a result of the willful or intentional acts committed by the plaintiff ( see, State Farm Fire Cas. Co. v. Torio, 250 A.D.2d 833; Allstate Ins. Co. v. Bostick, 228 A.D.2d 628; Hancock Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Warmuth, 205 A.D.2d 587). Accordingly, since the underlying personal injury action seeks to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of an alleged assault and battery and other intentional acts, the defendant was not obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiff, and the instant complaint was properly dismissed.

Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harmann v. Allstate Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 1999
260 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Harmann v. Allstate Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT W. HARMANN, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 600

Citing Cases

Pagano v. Allstate Insurance Company

The homeowner's and personal umbrella policies issued by the defendant to the plaintiffs excluded coverage…

Interboro Mut. Indemy. Ins. Co. v. Fatsis

reme Court erred in awarding partial summary judgment to the defendants John Fatsis and William Fatsis on the…