Summary
stating "in a ‘negotiated’ plea agreement, where a sentence of specific duration has been made part of a plea bargain, it would clearly make a sham of the negotiated plea process for courts to allow defendants to later challenge their sentence; this would, in effect, give defendants a second bite at the sentencing process"
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. HarrisOpinion
No. 94-2030.
October 2, 1995, OCTOBER TERM, 1995.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 47 F. 3d 857.