From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harkenrider v. Hochul

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 5, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 69120 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

Motion No. CAE 22-00895

07-05-2022

IN THE MATTER OF TIM HARKENRIDER, PETITIONER, v. GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL, LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR AND PRESIDENT SENATE BRIAN A. BENJAMIN, SENATE MAJORITY LEADER AND PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF SENATE ANDREW STEWART-COUSINS, SPEAKER OF ASSEMBLY CARL HEASTIE, NEW YORK BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE TASK FORCE ON DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH AND REAPPORTIONMENT, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. PARENT PARTY, INTERVENOR-APPELLANT.


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

Intervenor-appellant having moved for a calendar preference on the appeal taken herein from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County, entered June 1, 2022,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied.


Summaries of

Harkenrider v. Hochul

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 5, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 69120 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Harkenrider v. Hochul

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF TIM HARKENRIDER, PETITIONER, v. GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 5, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 69120 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Citing Cases

Tokos v. Cnty. of Broome

The Defendants are directed to amend the new district maps to conform with the law without delay. See Matter…

O'Hara v. Bd. of Elections in City of New York

Petitioner's arguments in the application arise from the consequences of reapportionment of New York State…