In Hare v. Gibson, 32 Ohio St. 33, in circumstances analogous to the instant case the court held that persons dealing with the wife do so at their own peril and are chargeable with knowledge of the allotment and payment of the alimony.
Summary of this case from Albert A. Coken Inc. v. DeanNo. 99-296.
April 28, 1999
APPEAL from Franklin App. No. 98AP-244.
In Hare v. Gibson, 32 Ohio St. 33, in circumstances analogous to the instant case the court held that persons dealing with the wife do so at their own peril and are chargeable with knowledge of the allotment and payment of the alimony.
Summary of this case from Albert A. Coken Inc. v. DeanFull title:HARE v. GIBSON
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Apr 28, 1999
The power to award counsel fees is regulated by the same section of the Code which authorizes the award of…
Klein v. DulaThe power to award counsel fees is regulated by the same section of the Code which authorizes the award of…