From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harden v. Bodiford

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 27, 2010
380 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6041.

Submitted: May 20, 2010.

Decided: May 27, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:09-cv-02362-HFF-WMC).

William G. Harden, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., Chapman, Harter, Groves, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


William G. Harden seeks to appeal the district court's orders dismissing certain defendants and denying Harden's motion to amend. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Harden seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Harden's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Harden v. Bodiford

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 27, 2010
380 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Harden v. Bodiford

Case Details

Full title:William G. HARDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott BODIFORD, Administrator…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 27, 2010

Citations

380 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Harden v. Bodiford

We previously dismissed for lack of jurisdiction Harden's interlocutory appeal from certain of the district…