From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardee v. Nelson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 9, 1969
407 F.2d 1315 (9th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 23003.

February 25, 1969. Rehearing Denied April 9, 1969.

James Earl Hardee, for appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Derald E. Granberg, Charles R.B. Kirk, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MERRILL, ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.


Appellant alleges facts in support of his contentions: (1) that his confession was coerced; and (2) that his guilty plea was induced by the confession. These allegations are quite different from those on which his earlier petition was based and entitle him to a hearing under Doran v. Wilson, 369 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1966).

The sufficiency of appellant's allegations respecting the adequacy of his representation by counsel presents a close question. Since those allegations are closely related to his contentions respecting his plea we feel that the scope of his hearing should include them as well.

Reversed and remanded for hearing.


Summaries of

Hardee v. Nelson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 9, 1969
407 F.2d 1315 (9th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

Hardee v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:James Earl HARDEE, Appellant, v. Louis S. NELSON, Warden, California State…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 9, 1969

Citations

407 F.2d 1315 (9th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

Ramseur v. United States

Our opinion in Graham v. United States, 407 F.2d 1313 (1969) opens with this sentence: "This appeal presents…